C1 & C2 Corvettes General C1 Corvette & C2 Corvette Discussion, Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Project Builds, Restorations

65 327/350HP by-pass hose

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-2010, 08:44 AM
  #1  
65specialk
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
65specialk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Gasburg Virginia
Posts: 1,091
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts

Default 65 327/350HP by-pass hose

Does the 65 require the by-pass hose from the water pump to the manifold?? My car did not have them before restoration and looked like it never did?? Dave
Old 06-04-2010, 08:50 AM
  #2  
Powershift
Race Director
 
Powershift's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Luling Louisiana
Posts: 10,467
Received 1,685 Likes on 1,310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65specialk
Does the 65 require the by-pass hose from the water pump to the manifold?? My car did not have them before restoration and looked like it never did?? Dave
Yes. Connects the "326" water pump to the Winters aluminum manifold for improved engine warm-up and cooling.

Check that you have the correct water pump and manifold....the connections should be there. Many cars have the water pump and/or intake manifold replaced sometime in their life, and the bypass hose gets deleted.

Larry
The following users liked this post:
marshal135 (08-27-2022)
Old 06-04-2010, 09:33 AM
  #3  
62Jeff
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62Jeff's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Conroe Texas
Posts: 15,503
Received 49 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 65specialk
Does the 65 require the by-pass hose from the water pump to the manifold?? My car did not have them before restoration and looked like it never did?? Dave
I'm focusing on the word "require".

If you are doing a full restoration, then the bypass hose should be in place.

On the other hand, my 65 327/350 is missing the bypass and I have not experienced overheating issues, even in traffic in August in Houston. I've chosen not to try to add the bypass, because I don't want to risk damaging the intake when removing the plug that has been in the intake for who-knows how many years.
Old 06-04-2010, 10:06 AM
  #4  
Powershift
Race Director
 
Powershift's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2005
Location: Luling Louisiana
Posts: 10,467
Received 1,685 Likes on 1,310 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 62Jeff
I'm focusing on the word "require".

If you are doing a full restoration, then the bypass hose should be in place.

On the other hand, my 65 327/350 is missing the bypass and I have not experienced overheating issues, even in traffic in August in Houston. I've chosen not to try to add the bypass, because I don't want to risk damaging the intake when removing the plug that has been in the intake for who-knows how many years.
Jeff:

Agree........it is not REQUIRED. But it should improve WARM-UP and COOLANT CIRCULATION through the engine. It probably was done (by GM) for the iron engine block and the aluminum manifold due to the differences in thermal expansion for the two metals.

But it shouldn't have an impact on engine COOLING since no additional water flow goes through the radiator.

Larry
Old 06-04-2010, 10:09 AM
  #5  
62Jeff
Tech Contributor
Support Corvetteforum!
 
62Jeff's Avatar
 
Member Since: May 2005
Location: Conroe Texas
Posts: 15,503
Received 49 Likes on 39 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Powershift
Jeff:

Agree........it is not REQUIRED. But it should improve WARM-UP and COOLANT CIRCULATION through the engine. It probably was done (by GM) for the iron engine block and the aluminum manifold due to the differences in thermal expansion for the two metals.

But it shouldn't have an impact on engine COOLING since no additional water flow goes through the radiator.

Larry
Larry I agree totally. I don't think GM would have added it without a good reason.

I have all the parts I need to put it back on my 65, but I fear that trying to remove that pipe plug from my aluminum intake after 20+ years (I know the car history back to 89) will crack the intake. So for now I'm leaving mine off, but wishing it were in place.

Jeff
Old 06-04-2010, 10:15 AM
  #6  
65specialk
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
65specialk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jul 2007
Location: Gasburg Virginia
Posts: 1,091
Received 26 Likes on 21 Posts

Default

Correct water pump in place. I heated the area around the plug with a heat gun. It softened the sealer and plug came right out. DO NOT over tighten.
Thanks Dave
Old 06-04-2010, 10:23 AM
  #7  
larrywalk
Melting Slicks

 
larrywalk's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2002
Location: St Louis MO
Posts: 2,307
Received 104 Likes on 74 Posts

Default

The bypass is good because it circulates water through the block, helping the block to warm evenly and allowing the thermostat to see the average temperature.

With aftermarket intake manifold installations that don't have a bypass hole in the left front manifold boss, I drill and tap for 3/8 or 1/2 NPT so that I can add a bypass; I restrict the passage in the bypass nipple to 3/8", Also, when you do this, it is a good idea to block the lower (3/8th dia) bypass hole in the pass side leg of the water pump as it performs a similar function, but only to the pass side of the block.

Old 08-27-2022, 06:54 PM
  #8  
JQ108
Intermediate
 
JQ108's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jan 2022
Location: Santa Clara
Posts: 33
Received 19 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 65specialk
Correct water pump in place. I heated the area around the plug with a heat gun. It softened the sealer and plug came right out. DO NOT over tighten.
Thanks Dave
How long did you heat around the plug and at what temperature? I am having the hardest time getting this out.

Get notified of new replies

To 65 327/350HP by-pass hose




Quick Reply: 65 327/350HP by-pass hose



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 AM.