Notices
C6 Corvette ZR1 & Z06 General info about GM’s Corvette Supercar, LS9 Corvette Technical Info, Performance Upgrades, Suspension Setup for Street or Track
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Kraken

[Z06] WEIGHT vs HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-25-2011, 10:36 PM
  #21  
MitchAlsup
Le Mans Master
 
MitchAlsup's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2000
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 5,056
Received 1,606 Likes on 793 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tigertank
isnt there a formula or guestimate on how much HP it takes to make up the weight diff?
There are three different arenas where weight and HP can be traded off.

A) dead stop to (say) 60 MPH. This is the traction limited case (for a Z06). There is essentially no amount of HP that can make spinning tires spin faster and gain time in 0-60. Here, weight is pure king. Also note: tires that are more heavily loaded have reduced traction per unit weight.

B) power limited acceleration. This is the power limited domain from about 60-140 MPH and the arena where there is some correspondence between weight and HP that is fairly linear.

C) speed limited. This is the aerodynamic drag limited case. Here, as long as the weight is not adding drag to the vehicle, top speed remains the same (however, it might take a few more seconds to achieve top speed.)
Old 05-26-2011, 05:29 PM
  #22  
0GHL Exhaust
Former Vendor
 
GHL Exhaust's Avatar
 
Member Since: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,993
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I think it's 7lbs for every 1 hp.
Old 05-26-2011, 07:50 PM
  #23  
LEAVINU
Le Mans Master
 
LEAVINU's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2006
Location: Cumming, GA
Posts: 5,079
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by B505
This will explain it all.

They start with a light car, lose 100 lbs
then lose 500 lbs

they end up gaining more than .1 for every hundred pounds on this particular car. Although its extreme, you can see what weight does. Imagine this gap on a road coarse, turn after turn, and you'll see why lighter is better!

http://www.hulu.com/watch/228074/car...pped-for-speed



They should have at least left the intake and exhaust on so there were no "engine mods" but we all know a car like that won't gain much but still gains something. Either way 500lbs off any car will make it move pretty damn good.
Old 05-27-2011, 02:18 PM
  #24  
PRE-Z06
Race Director

 
PRE-Z06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2006
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 11,207
Received 2,084 Likes on 1,331 Posts

Default

Aero and gearing of course have to be taken into account also when comparing 2 different vehicles. The rule of thumb 10hp=100lbs=.1 is somewhat accurate in the realm of 13 sec vehicles, it doesn't apply in the 10sec arena
Old 05-27-2011, 08:04 PM
  #25  
40YRW8
Drifting
 
40YRW8's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Oro Valley Arizona
Posts: 1,869
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Comparing a Mustang to a Corvette in terms of power to weight will never work due to an endless number of variables. As far as trying to pin down exactly how much weight will equal a certain power gain is a little easier but also no clear answers. The best thing you can do is add power until you are done with engine mods then start reducing the weight as far as you can reasonably go and live with the results. The weight reductions, though small and expensive give you a performance edge not only in accelleration but also in lateral grip and stopping power. They also don't use any gas and give you those benefits every time you move your car for ever at no further cost. The bottom line should be, "Who cares! Just do it!"
Gary
Old 05-28-2011, 01:10 PM
  #26  
NORTY
Race Director
 
NORTY's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2005
Location: Carlsbad Ca
Posts: 10,161
Received 401 Likes on 254 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tigertank
isnt there a formula or guestimate on how much HP it takes to make up the weight diff?

like 5 HP for ev 10 lbs of weight?
Sure, for every 20 lbs of weight, it takes 1 add'l viagra. I'm just guessing here since you didn't state for what purpose...
Old 05-29-2011, 01:24 AM
  #27  
Halltech
Supporting Vendor
 
Halltech's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2002
Location: Bristol, Tennessee
Posts: 12,989
Received 589 Likes on 315 Posts
St. Jude Donor '09

Default

So that's why my 2950 lb Z06 with 700 HP goes sideways in second gear at half throttle. 4.13lbs/hp. Now every 4.13lbs of weight savings equals 1 HP, but I'll have to recalculate often, since it is a moving target.

Believe it. Power to weight ratio is everything in racing. Now imagine our stopping power, with the Carbon Ceramic ZR1 brakes with 375 less pounds to stop than the ZR1. I weight 169. If I was a fatty, I would likely not be on this power/weight kick. I would just add Nitrous.

Jim
Old 05-29-2011, 09:21 PM
  #28  
novaz06
Pro
 
novaz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Dec 2007
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 596
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

i remember reading a article in hot rod maybe twenty years ago where they took a stock dodge polara I think, which was body on frame, and removed the entire car except for the rolling frame and engine, and it ran I believe in the 12s
Old 05-30-2011, 10:04 AM
  #29  
naradz06
Instructor
 
naradz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vette5.5
Answer: Lighter's better.
except traction is a function of normal force, related by coeff of friction. So unless you have spikes on your tires, you'll need some weight.
Old 05-30-2011, 03:46 PM
  #30  
40YRW8
Drifting
 
40YRW8's Avatar
 
Member Since: Mar 2006
Location: Oro Valley Arizona
Posts: 1,869
Received 21 Likes on 11 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by naradz06
except traction is a function of normal force, related by coeff of friction. So unless you have spikes on your tires, you'll need some weight.
Not quite true. If you move weight to the rear, you will in fact pick up more accelleration. However, just adding weight might not. With a rubber tire, if you double the weight on the tire, you don't quite get double the traction. That is why it works to tune a chassis by changing the tire loading. The most traction comes with the minimum amount of weight on a tire, not the most.
Gary
Old 05-30-2011, 08:02 PM
  #31  
naradz06
Instructor
 
naradz06's Avatar
 
Member Since: Apr 2011
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 40YRW8
Not quite true. If you move weight to the rear, you will in fact pick up more accelleration. However, just adding weight might not. With a rubber tire, if you double the weight on the tire, you don't quite get double the traction. That is why it works to tune a chassis by changing the tire loading. The most traction comes with the minimum amount of weight on a tire, not the most.
Gary
*yawn*....ya, I was just tryin to be a smarta$$ because you can't reduce the vehicle's weight ad finem.

But I completely understand your rather over simplifed view of some complicated stuff. Oh, and you get the most traction when your wheels slip a little too...
Old 09-15-2011, 10:32 AM
  #32  
sadunbar
3rd Gear
 
sadunbar's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2011
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

QUOTE=Painrace;1577705748]I used to race against a guy named Jerry Dunbar. Jerry was faster than the thunders of hell, but, Jerry weighed more than double what I did. The cars were weighed without driver so the cars had to weigh about the same (2,450# to 2,600# depending on engine displacement and type of transmission). Jerry was a great qualifier but all you had to do was keep up with him and toward the end of the race Jerry's tires would start to give up because of the extra weight. Weight matters a lot in road racing. You don't see many fat pro racers. Take a look at the Corvette guys, Ron fellows, Andy Pilgrim, etc. The more weight you can shed the faster you will go. It is simple physics.

Jim[/QUOTE]

You mean this guy?



Old 01-13-2015, 01:53 AM
  #33  
Greywolfe
Racer
 
Greywolfe's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2008
Location: Houston Texas
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

99% of the posters on this thread are

'Not smarter than a 3rd grader'

Old 01-13-2015, 10:10 AM
  #34  
juanvaldez
Team Owner
 
juanvaldez's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 26,430
Received 493 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

http://www.stealth316.com/2-calc-hp-et-mph.htm

Quarter mile times are primarily a function of weight and horsepower.

On the Corvettes 6 - 7 lbs = 1 hp.

The only reason Danika Patrick is a driver is because she weighs 100 lbs and she is good looking. I think the Indy guy got smart and made the weight rules car + driver.

Last edited by juanvaldez; 01-13-2015 at 10:12 AM.
Old 01-13-2015, 12:29 PM
  #35  
Vette @ 71
Burning Brakes
 
Vette @ 71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Columbia Maryland
Posts: 943
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Interesting calculators

http://measurespeed.com/
Old 01-13-2015, 12:48 PM
  #36  
juanvaldez
Team Owner
 
juanvaldez's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 26,430
Received 493 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vette @ 71
Interesting calculators

http://measurespeed.com/
Interesting. For 1/4 mile, 3,000 lb/500 hp 10.6, 3,100 hp/500 hp 10.7.
Old 01-13-2015, 01:11 PM
  #37  
Vette @ 71
Burning Brakes
 
Vette @ 71's Avatar
 
Member Since: Oct 2012
Location: Columbia Maryland
Posts: 943
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by juanvaldez
Interesting. For 1/4 mile, 3,000 lb/500 hp 10.6, 3,100 hp/500 hp 10.7.
With perfect shifting, driving and traction ..

Get notified of new replies

To WEIGHT vs HP

Old 01-13-2015, 01:19 PM
  #38  
hyteck9
Burning Brakes
 
hyteck9's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PRE-Z06
The rule of thumb 10hp=100lbs=.1 is somewhat accurate in the realm of 13 sec vehicles, it doesn't apply in the 10sec arena
Old 01-13-2015, 01:29 PM
  #39  
juanvaldez
Team Owner
 
juanvaldez's Avatar
 
Member Since: Sep 2014
Posts: 26,430
Received 493 Likes on 364 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by hyteck9
The calculator is a little optimistic giving 10.8 for 3,200/505 hp . . . say a Z06. Maybe half a second.
Old 01-13-2015, 01:42 PM
  #40  
hyteck9
Burning Brakes
 
hyteck9's Avatar
 
Member Since: Aug 2009
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 941
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by juanvaldez
The calculator is a little optimistic giving 10.8 for 3,200/505 hp . . . say a Z06. Maybe half a second.

It is all relative. Obviously if you add 500 lbs to a motorcycle you have a world of challenges ahead of you to make up for it.

If the weight you are adding is only 10-20% of the vehicle weight, the 10/.1/100 rule is a great place to start planning.



Quick Reply: [Z06] WEIGHT vs HP



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:01 PM.